To Do For All That Which No One Can Do For Oneself
Header

Dear Members,
We are reaching out to ask for your support in protecting the integrity of the federal civil service and our ability to effectively serve the public.

The Office of Personnel Management (OPM) has recently introduced three proposed rules that could significantly weaken longstanding civil service protections. These changes may undermine the stability and independence that federal employees rely on to perform their duties with professionalism and integrity.

  1. The Suitability Appeals Rule
    This proposal would broaden management's authority to remove or discipline federal employees using loosely defined "suitability" criteria. Because these standards can be interpreted broadly, there is concern that they could be applied inconsistently or without sufficient safeguards.
  2. The RIF Appeal Rule
    The proposed rule would limit employees' ability to challenge layoffs and reductions-in-force. By narrowing the appeal process, the rule could make it easier for agencies to remove experienced public servants without adequate oversight.
  3. The Performance Appraisal Rule for General Schedule, Prevailing Rate, and Certain Other Employees
    While this proposal includes several updates to existing regulations, two of the most concerning changes are the removal of employees' ability to grieve performance ratings and the elimination of mandatory second-level reviews for Level 1 ratings. An overview of these proposed changes was recently covered in a FEDweek article.

See Attached for additional information.

On November 25, 2025, the Agency provided the Union with an “informational notice” stating that the Agency would begin requiring employees to “badge in” and “badge out” (or “BIBO”) of agency space using their HSPD-12 cards (also known as PIV cards), effective December 1, 2025.

On November 25, 2025, the Union submitted a bargaining demand and request for a briefing.

On December 9, 2025, the Agency provided a briefing on BIBO. The Agency clarified that it was implementing BIBO pursuant to Section 2302 (Utilizing Space Efficiently and Improving Technologies Act) of the Thomas R. Carper Water Resources Development Act of 2024, which requires federal agencies to implement technological methods to measure agency space usage.

On January 21, 2026, the Agency denied the Union’s bargaining demand and information request. In denying the bargaining demand, the Agency asserted that BIBO data is not intended to be used for discipline, but that should management decide to discipline an employee due to non-compliance with BIBO, they would follow Article 23 of the National Agreement.

REQUESTED RELIEF
1.
The Agency will engage in consultation and negotiations with the Union on mutually agreed-upon dates, ideally within 30 days. In advance of the consultation/bargaining, the Agency will provide the Union with a comprehensive notice explaining its planned BIBO policy, addressing issues raised by the Union, especially any abatement of known safety hazards.
2.
The Agency will provide the Union with the information requested on December 17, 2025, as amended above.
3.
The Agency will issue an electronic notice to all AFGE bargaining unit employees via email, with wording approved by the Union or ordered by an arbitrator.
4.
The Agency will make the Union and any adversely affected employees whole.
5.
Any other relief as mutually agreed upon, or as ordered by an arbitrator.

Review the full grievance below.

Message from Richard Couture, Chairperson of General Committee:

This morning, the arbitrator issued her decision sustaining the Union's national telework grievance, stating that "temporarily" does not and cannot mean "indefinite", that any temporary suspensions or reductions must be time-limited and specific to conditions, and ordering a return to our past telework levels.

This is a positive step forward for SSA workers, who have had to pay thousands in commuting and child care costs at a time when most AFGE bargaining unit employees aren't making a living wage.

While SSA may appeal this decision to the Federal Labor Relations Authority (FLRA), the Union encourages the Agency to implement the award and reinstate our successful telework program.

AFGE bargaining unit employees have proven for three decades, and especially since our March 2022 re-entry after COVID, that telework is to the benefit of the public by boosting productivity, recruitment and retention, and morale.

Telework was, and remains, essential to preventing attrition at a time when SSA needs every employee it can hold onto; a point on which even the Government Accountability Office (GAO) agrees as stated in a recent report. Put another way, telework is in the public interest, the Agency's interest, and the employees' interests. 

MESSAGE from Jessica LaPointe, C-220 President:

We are pleased to inform you that an arbitrator has issued a decision sustaining our telework grievance in full.  The arbitrator has ordered the Agency to:

  • Restore telework to pre-March 16, 2025 levels (status quo ante)
  • Cease and desist from further violations of Article 41 of the National Agreement
  • Post notice of the violation at all workplaces for thirty days and electronically disseminate it by email to all bargaining unit employees

This outcome belongs to every member who endured the past year, every long commute, every rearranged childcare plan, every added expense, while continuing to serve the public with professionalism and dedication.

Beyond the legal obligation, the case for restoring telework has never been stronger, and we are calling on Agency leadership to do the right thing for this workforce, the public we serve, and SSA's own future. The Government Accountability Office confirmed this January that telework did not cause SSA's service challenges and that the loss of telework threatens the Agency's ability to recruit and retain the skilled workers it needs. The data is clear:

  • Telework aligns with how the public wants to be served, approximately 96% of field office work is portable, and teleservice center, workload support unit, and field office support unit work is 100% portable
  • Telework saves workers and the Agency real money, real money that is not discretionary for workers who do not yet earn a living wage 
  • In-person service and field office operations do not suffer under a voluntary hybrid work model, they are strengthened by it. Productivity is enhanced when employees can focus on portable work free from in-office distractions, in-person coverage remains fully intact on rotationally required in-person days, and continuity of service to the public is maintained and protected when an office must temporarily close for inclement weather or other health or safety reasons
  • Telework works, for productivity, for recruitment and retention, for cost savings, for continuity of service, and for meeting the public where they want to be served 

Message from AFGE General Committee Spokesperson:

Please see attached, which is a settlement agreement between the parties to make changes to the awards system in Article 17 and to engage in settlement discussions over PACS and our GC union-management grievances in the near future. This agreement was made in connection with the latter issue, but no grievances were withdrawn as part of this agreement. The settlement agreement changes the names of the awards from “recognition of contribution” (ROC) to “performance award” and the “exemplary contribution or service award” (ECSA) to “on-the-spot award”.

The agreement expands eligibility for the performance award (formerly ROC) from an element average of 4.0 to 3.5, which will grant thousands more employees an award each year starting this year.

The agreement lifts the $800 cap on non-ratings based awards, meaning potentially higher on-the-spot (formerly) ECSA awards.

The agreement incorporates the Time Off Award MOU as a sidebar to Article 17, putting the MOU into the contract.

The agreement also changes the language in Article 17, Section 3.B, which previously initially allocated 75% of funds to ROCs and 25% to ECSAs, and then unspent ROC money would be transferred over to ECSAs. Each fiscal year, once the ROC awards were paid, millions were transferred to the ECSA pot months later. The intent of the language is to acknowledge the status quo and to speed up the processing of both types of awards by ensuring that the ROCs (now performance awards) get the funds they require and then allocating the awards to the on-the-spot awards.

The Agency has stated its intent to issues awards sooner than in past years, to grant awards to more employees, and to have the awards be meaningful. These are laudable goals and we will work to ensure those goals are realized.

In solidarity,

Rich Couture